Cleaner Greener China

March 30, 2009

Building the Future on Sludge

Filed under: Greener Products — Tags: , — Rich @ 2:56 am

With one of the key areas of focus in China to improve efficiencies being buildings, and building materials, I found the Cleantech article Sludge-powered cement in China? particularly interesting.

Guangdong, China-based Guangzhou Heidelberg Yuexiu Cement said it began treating sludge this week at its RMB 70 million ($10.2 million) facility designed to turn the wastewater byproduct into a fuel for cement-making.

The company expects the technology to both reduce the coal needed to produce cement, as well as tackle the sludge problem in China.

Initially, I must admit that I experienced a bit of a gag reflex when I first read this article as I thought about the fact that buildings of sludge laden cement would result from this technology. However it did not take me long to look past that and realize that with millions of km of road being planned as part of the recent stimulus package this was a product with a bright future.

March 29, 2009

Earthhour Turns Out the Lights In China

Filed under: Greener NGOs — Rich @ 6:30 am

Last night, at 8:30 while walking down the street, we noticed that the lights along Nanjing Road had gone out.  We had just finished our dinner, and it was good to see that the normally bright lights of Plaza 66 were off.

There are a few articles covering the event, and I am pleasantly surprised with the results that the WWF team achieved.  They have done a good job.

Over the last week, I have heard a number of comments and read a number of posts about the effectiveness of the event, and whether or not it meant anything.  It is a hard question to address, however I am optimistic that the event on the whole is a good thing as it

(1) people and governments around the world shut off their lights, showing an awareness of the issues we face (good thing)
(2) these people and organizations, through their actions will have an ongoing impact as they talk about their participation with friends  (good thing)
(3) the free media attention that has come along with the event only guarantees that WWF will have a larger platform next year to bring more participants into the fold

A couple of areas that I feel can/ need to be improved are:

1) Time
Honestly, of all the criticisms that I heard – and discussed – it was that asking companies around the world to run off their lights at 8:30 pm on a Saturday night was the biggest one. It is simply a continuation of asking people to make a change without sacrificing anything, and we are teaching this as a solution when it is not.

Make the time one that requires companies/ people to make a sacrifice that goes beyond the symbolic. People need to begin understanding, and recognizing that we are not going to overcome the issues we face by simply cutting the fat off a weekend night.

2) Education
Giving out candles and asking people to turn off their lights cannot be the platform. It should not be “the” event, but a means to and end where money raised can go into education programs that create awareness in students, within communities, and drive companies to make longer lasting change.

These events need to be the entry point to a wider platform that scales organically and bring real results through changing mindsets.

I myself believe that there is a platform here, and that the event itself can be a called a success, but I encourage groups like McDonald’s to sign up at a much higher level next year because if they don’t I believe WWF will have the ability to leverage social media against them… those businesses who leave their lights on.

Greenpeace China 3rd Investment Newsletter Released

Filed under: Greener NGOs — Rich @ 1:29 am

Greenpeace

While the Rainbow warriors may be known around the world for the way that they create awareness on environmental issues, in China they have made a name for themselves as providers of amazing research.

To highlight some of their recent pieces, they have released a newsletter containing descriptions and links to 4 new pieces.

Ignoring the Environment Is Not a Viable Strategy in ChinaDownload

Are the Banks Putting Their Money Where Their Mouths Are?Download

How Hong Kong is Falling Behind on ESG IssuesDownload

Forestry Companies Must Say More About Their Green Credentials When They Seek a Hong Kong ListingDownload

March 28, 2009

Fuji Xerox Achieves No Emissions and 3 Certifications in Suzhou

Filed under: Greener Products — Tags: — Rich @ 11:05 am

Fuji Xerox Suzhou

In what may sound like a bit of propaganda, Fuji Xerox’s Suzhou facility has just received ISO9001, ISO14001 and OHSAS18001 Certifications for their plant which was designed for the three zeros:

Fuji Xerox Eco-Manufacturing (Suzhou) constructed an integrated recycling system in China and commenced operation in January 2008 with the aim of achieving “zero landfill,” “no pollution” and “no illegal disposal.”

It is a fantastic example of a facility whose very design will result in not only a reduced direct footprint, but will help to drastically improve the legacy footprint of many Fuji products:

Fuji Xerox Eco-Manufacturing (Suzhou) completely disassembles and recycles used products including copy/multifunction devices and cartridges recovered from all over China (excluding Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan) by Fuji Xerox (China) Ltd., Fuji Xerox’s sales company in China. The recycling site commenced operation in January 2008, has the capacity to disassemble and recycle 15,000 devices and 500,000 cartridges per year, and aims to achieve recycling rates of more than 96 percent for devices and 99 percent for cartridges by the end of March 2009.

Where I would love to see Fuji take this a step further would be to not only use this facility to recylce content, but to use it as a facility that could refurbish products, and/ or reuse old product to construct new products as well.

It is something not specifically addressed in the article, but going down that patch is the subject of my next Sustainable Manufacturing article for Supply Chain Asia, and it is my hope that there are plans for this.

The facility is already dismantling the product, the products are largely cmposted of comodity / platic parts, and while there may be a little wear and tear, that could easily be overcome with a new coat of paint.

March 27, 2009

Ma Jun on Defending Water Security

Filed under: Greener People — Tags: , , — Rich @ 8:23 am

In the recent China Dialogue Article Defending Water Security, Ma Jun writes a very compelling piece on what can happen when weak environmental protection is allowed to continue.

Following the recent events in Yancheng, the article shows the time line leading up to the spill possessed not only multiple opportunities to prevent the accident, but that local officials were fully aware that it was only a matter of time before an accident happened:

In the meeting that set out the plan, one city leader described the threat from chemical plants as a time bomb threatening water security in Yancheng. He cited a chemical leak at Longfeng Aromatics, strange odours coming from the river in 2004 and 2005 and a waste leak from Anhu Agricultural Chemicals in 2007.

However, one year later Yancheng extended the deadline for closing or relocating 10 of the firms until the end of 2009. These firms included Biaoxin. Indecision and delay meant a serious incident was permitted to happen. On February 20, Biaoxin dumped 30 tonnes of phenol-contaminated effluent into the Mangshe River.

It is a decision tree that unfortunately is rooted very deeply in China. One where attitudes are incubated to believe that either it won’t happen to them, or that if it does happen, someone else will be held responsible for it persists.

Going forward though, and perhaps Ma Jun could have added a bit of punch with this, is that there are problems all over China that are festering because weak enforcement and sense of responsibility are inhibiting action. .. and that we are only going to see problems grow in frequency and size

If we want to drink clean water, we need to control pollution and stop projects that contaminate our rivers. This requires widespread participation in environmental management and policymaking. Understanding the environmental costs and benefits of various projects will help us find a balance and a negotiated compromise between different interests. We have no time to waste: to protect our water we need a new type of decision-making. It will test the will and the capacity of government at all levels to implement the scientific view of development.

March 26, 2009

China’s Water Week Posters

Filed under: Greener People — Tags: — Rich @ 10:15 am

In an effort to spread the word during China’s water week, a couple of new posters were rolled out.

While a fan of educating the masses, I have to admit that I am left a little short on the messaging that these posters are trying to convey.

The left poster mainly reveals water conservation and is made up of water project, water saving activity, water saving irrigation, water saving implement and urban water scenery.

and

The right poster displays water protection and consists of wastewater treatment, water storage project, water quality monitoring and vital natural wetland.

Perhaps going forward, those in power could be a little more direct in their efforts to educate the public in their role as responsible citizens and business leaders. Those who really need to be targeted.

I understand the need for happy propoganda and that it is important to show the role of technology, monitoring, and proper irrigation as part of the “grand strategy”, but to have a real impact over the long term, more focus on what every day citizens can do to reduce their water footprint and a little more on anti-dumping would really go much farther.

… and perhaps adding a phone number in case one sees chemical sludge being dumped into the river would also be nice.

Hawaii and China Meet on Energy Cooperation

Filed under: Greener People, Policies and Issues — Tags: , — Rich @ 8:03 am

Hawaii Reporter article Hawaii Hosting Official U.S.-China Energy Meeting highlights a recent effort to bring the scientific communities from the US And China together to develop relationships, a common understanding, and hopefully some solutions.

Ok, maybe that is a bit much, but according to the article their goals were to develop a task force that would:

U.S. and Chinese scientists and technicians will look for ways the two countries can cooperate in developing and utilizing electricity from renewable energy. As major technology exporters, the U.S. and China are also poised to jointly lead the way in fostering a worldwide transition to renewable energy-based economies.

The study will pursue three separate but related goals:

  • Comparatively assessing the resource potential in China and the U.S. for grid-scale electricity generation;
  • Exploring near-term market opportunities for mature technologies; and
  • Recommending priorities for enhanced collaboration, with a focus on cost reduction, improved efficiency and grid connectivity, and storage.

Where I am a bit hesitant is that I am still of the mind that we shoudl really be BEYOND the talking stage, and really would like to see a stage of action.

A pilot program. A co-investment… a something.

Another area of hesitation is the fact that both countries have grids that few would either consider smart, nor say that should be a first priority in terms of developing a sustainable economy. so, working on topics that could have impact now would also be nice

Building technologies that exist to reduce energy footprint, lighting technology, insulation & glass, etc.

March 25, 2009

First Hotel Designed as Carbon Neutral is … Designed

Filed under: Greener Companies, Greener Products — Tags: , , , , — Rich @ 8:22 pm

In another, don’t pop the bubbly story, Patel Architecture Inc. announced that they have completed the design of a 5-Star China Hotel To Be Carbon-Neutral

For those of you who are saying… Wait a minute, URBN hotel in Shanghai is the first carbon neutral hotel, you would be right… and wrong.

Where this story really is interesting, is that per the announcement, it appears that this facility will not require the purchase of carbon offsetting and will deploy a lot of technology to make it carbon neutral by operation and design:

The design provides for wind turbines on the upper portion of the tower and massive array of photovoltaic panels covering the entire south façade. In the basement is a provision to incorporate a fuel cell power generator that would run on clean natural gas to efficiently produce electricity and heat for hot water. The proposed groundbreaking design of the 373-key Mayland Seaside Hotel would make it the first hotel in the world to be completely carbon-neutral.

To be completed by 2012 – 2013, I look forward to seeing what changes/ compromises are made to bring the project to market.

ARUP Inks MOU with Wuhan Development Zone to Go Eco

Filed under: Uncategorized — Rich @ 9:55 am

In their recent announcement that they had been appointed by the Wuhan Economic Development Zone to develop an eco-zone:

“We are delighted to be appointed by WEDZ on this significant project which will have a long-lasting impact on masterplanning in China.”

It is as if the Dongtan program had not phased them at all.

March 24, 2009

60,000 Alternative Fuel Vehicles to Hit Streets by 2012

Filed under: Greener Products, Greener Tech — Tags: — Rich @ 8:11 pm

Not sure what to make of this other than to resign myself to the fact that 60,000 alternative fuel vehicles to hit the streets by 2012 is a start…. but given over 600,000 vehicles were sold in February 2009 alone, we have such a long way to go before popping the bubbly.

It is much like the DHL Go Green program, where 43 trucks (of more than 1500) being advertised as a green option, in a sense as both are clearly good programs that really need to be catalyzed to scale in a huge way.

Question to the crowd – why the need to take 3 years for this? If GM and others can pump out a thousand cars a day, where is the gap? Is the technology lagging behind? IS there no capacity in the system? Or is this just something they are announcing to look good and hope people will forget about in 3 years?

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress