<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Apparently Isn&#8217;t Well in Tianjin EcoCity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanergreenerchina.com/2009/12/29/all-apparently-isnt-well-in-tianjin-ecocity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanergreenerchina.com/2009/12/29/all-apparently-isnt-well-in-tianjin-ecocity/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=all-apparently-isnt-well-in-tianjin-ecocity</link>
	<description>Clean Technology, Green Products, New Ideas, Clean China</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:56:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanergreenerchina.com/2009/12/29/all-apparently-isnt-well-in-tianjin-ecocity/comment-page-1/#comment-19479</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 19:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanergreenerchina.com/?p=2095#comment-19479</guid>
		<description>jd, 

Good question.  I would say that if there is a reason to be more optimistic about Nanjing vs. Tianjin is that Suzhou and Nanjing are close in proximity and the relationships are likely to be stronger.

.. but one could easily counter argument.

R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jd, </p>
<p>Good question.  I would say that if there is a reason to be more optimistic about Nanjing vs. Tianjin is that Suzhou and Nanjing are close in proximity and the relationships are likely to be stronger.</p>
<p>.. but one could easily counter argument.</p>
<p>R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China News Roundup for January 1, 2009 &#171; China Environmental Governance</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanergreenerchina.com/2009/12/29/all-apparently-isnt-well-in-tianjin-ecocity/comment-page-1/#comment-19477</link>
		<dc:creator>China News Roundup for January 1, 2009 &#171; China Environmental Governance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanergreenerchina.com/?p=2095#comment-19477</guid>
		<description>[...] CGC – At first, I thought that as Singapore had successfully brought the Suzhou Singapore Investment Park to market, and the working relationships were developed at the highest levels of both governments, that would leave Singapore in better position when managing the Tianjin project. Little did I understand… [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CGC – At first, I thought that as Singapore had successfully brought the Suzhou Singapore Investment Park to market, and the working relationships were developed at the highest levels of both governments, that would leave Singapore in better position when managing the Tianjin project. Little did I understand… [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanergreenerchina.com/2009/12/29/all-apparently-isnt-well-in-tianjin-ecocity/comment-page-1/#comment-19472</link>
		<dc:creator>jd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanergreenerchina.com/?p=2095#comment-19472</guid>
		<description>how about the Nanjing ECO Island, is it part of SIP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about the Nanjing ECO Island, is it part of SIP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
